AltOps vs Claude

Claude reasons. AltOps runs the workflow.

Claude is a frontier assistant, and excellent at working through what you bring it. AltOps is the layer that takes one of your workflows, learns it from your team, and runs it in your systems without being asked.

Taught, not configured

Recorded by your team

Someone runs the workflow once with the recorder on and narrates it. The demonstration gives the steps; the narration gives the judgment. No spec, no process doc, no engineer.

Nothing to integrate

No API, no connector

There's no integration list to check, because there's nothing to wire up. The agent works your ERP, portals and spreadsheets by sight and click — including the ones that will never have an API.

A whole computer

Its own cloud desktop

Real browser, real apps, real files. It signs in — 2FA included — moves between systems mid-task, and stays signed in for every run after.

You stay in charge

Approvals and takeover

Watch the desktop live, stop for sign-off where it matters, grab the keyboard mid-run, and hand it back. Corrections go into the skill so the exception is handled next time.

AltOps vs Claude, line by line

AltOps
Claude
What it is
An agent taught one of your workflows, running it start to finish.
A general-purpose assistant you direct turn by turn.
How it learns your process
From a screen recording plus narration by the person who does the job.
From the context you provide in the conversation or project.
Knows your unwritten rules
Yes — the narration is where the judgment gets captured.
Only what's in the context you've set up for it.
Runs without you
Runs on a trigger or a schedule, around the clock.
Runs when a session starts or an API call fires.
Acting in your systems
Signs into your ERP and supplier portals on its own desktop, 2FA included.
Tool use and computer use exist via the API; wiring them to your stack is your build.
Systems with no usable API
The normal case — it works them by sight and click.
Reachable in principle, but you're building and hosting that yourself.
Credentials
Held in a password manager inside your own deployment.
Not designed to hold your ERP and portal logins.
Getting better over time
A correction updates the skill permanently.
Long context within a session; persistence across runs is your problem to solve.
Oversight
Live desktop view, sign-off points, takeover mid-run.
Whatever review you build into your own application.
Who operates it
The ops team, as a shared asset the whole team relies on.
Each person in their own chats; the API is shaped for developers.
Your data and model training
Never shared with model providers for training.
Governed by the plan and terms you're on — worth checking.

Where Claude wins

For hard reasoning, long documents and anything where you want a thinking partner, a frontier model is the right tool — and if you have engineers who want to build directly on the API, that's a real path. AltOps is for the other case: an ops team with no engineers, a workflow nobody has documented, and software that was never going to expose an API.

All comparisonsAltOps vs ChatGPT AltOps vs RPA & scripts

Try it on your own workflow.

Thirty minutes, one real process, your actual software. You'll see where it holds up and where it stops for you.

Book a demo