AltOps vs RPA & scripts

RPA follows a script. AltOps reads the screen.

Classic automation encodes the happy path an engineer was shown once, then breaks the first time a button moves. AltOps is taught by the people who handle the exceptions, and adapts when the UI does.

Taught, not configured

Recorded by your team

Someone runs the workflow once with the recorder on and narrates it. The demonstration gives the steps; the narration gives the judgment. No spec, no process doc, no engineer.

Nothing to integrate

No API, no connector

There's no integration list to check, because there's nothing to wire up. The agent works your ERP, portals and spreadsheets by sight and click — including the ones that will never have an API.

A whole computer

Its own cloud desktop

Real browser, real apps, real files. It signs in — 2FA included — moves between systems mid-task, and stays signed in for every run after.

You stay in charge

Approvals and takeover

Watch the desktop live, stop for sign-off where it matters, grab the keyboard mid-run, and hand it back. Corrections go into the skill so the exception is handled next time.

AltOps vs RPA & scripts, line by line

AltOps
RPA & scripts
How it gets built
An operator records the workflow and narrates it. That's the whole build step.
An engineer or consultant specifies each step, selector and branch up front.
Where the rules come from
The narration — including the judgment nobody wrote down.
A requirements doc, which captures the happy path and little else.
When the screen changes
Keeps working. It reads the live screen rather than a stored selector.
Breaks. A moved button or a new pop-up stops the run until someone fixes it.
Handling exceptions
Works out what's happening, finds a way forward, or escalates with context.
Fails to the error queue for a person to unpick.
Fixing a mistake
Correct it once and the skill updates. It doesn't recur.
File a change request and wait for the script to be rewritten and retested.
Systems with no API
Fine — it operates the desktop the way an employee does.
Also screen-driven, but tied to the exact layout it was recorded against.
Moving between systems
One agent, one desktop, ERP to portal to spreadsheet inside a single run.
Usually one bot per system, stitched together by someone maintaining the glue.
Ongoing maintenance
No scripts to maintain. Corrections come from the operators using it.
A standing engineering cost that grows with every workflow you add.
Who owns it day to day
The ops team that recorded it.
Whoever can edit the automation — usually not the ops team.
Time to live
Days. Record, review, run.
Weeks to months per workflow, depending on the queue.
Human takeover
Grab the mouse and keyboard mid-task, then hand it back to finish.
Typically stop the bot and redo the run by hand.

Where RPA still wins

If a workflow is genuinely fixed — same screen, same fields, same path, every single time, in a system nobody is going to update — a script is cheap and utterly predictable. The trouble is that most back-office work isn't that. The exceptions are the job, and they're exactly what a script can't hold.

All comparisonsAltOps vs ChatGPT AltOps vs Claude

Try it on your own workflow.

Thirty minutes, one real process, your actual software. You'll see where it holds up and where it stops for you.

Book a demo